"If a trust deed specifies that a beneficiary can receive only income for
life from the trust (no capital), how would a capital dividend from a mutual
fund be considered - income or capital" C.W. St. John's, NF
The reader raises a very interesting point. It is important to understand
that income can mean different things for different purposes. In other words
it is possible for something to be determined to be taxable as income and yet
for trust purposes not to be considered income.
Normally, unless a trust agreement otherwise defines income, income for trust
purposes is not to be considered from any capital appreciation. If a stock were
purchased and subsequently rose in value and then were sold, the increase in
capital would not be considered to be income for trust purposes. Accordingly
a beneficiary (whose only entitlement is to income) would have no interest in
the increased value of the stock. Instead, this increase would form part of
the capital to which the parties who are ultimately entitled to the residue
would share.
Revenue Canada, however would take a different view of this. The gain would
be defined to be a capital gain which is a type of income and is therefore taxable.
Normal dividends are considered to be income for both income tax purposes
and trust purposes. The normal dividend is taxable in accordance with the dividend
rules. It is also considered to be income to which an income beneficiary is
entitled to.
A dividend from the capital dividend account is a more difficult matter to
categorize. Under the Income Tax Act the portion of the capital gain which was
not subject to tax in a corporation is placed in the capital dividend account.
The corporation is permitted to declare a capital dividend out of this account
which can be received by the recipient without any income tax consequences.
Therefore, for income tax purposes, the capital dividend is not to be considered
income. The dividend is in fact a distribution of capital as it represents a
partial distribution of an appreciation to a capital asset in the corporation.
Accordingly, for trust purposes the dividend out of the capital dividend account
is not considered to be income but rather should form part of the corpus of
the trust.
The reader questions whether a capital dividend from a Mutual Fund is to be
considered income or capital. If the distribution is in fact a return of capital
rather than a taxable dividend, there would be no income tax consequences as
capital can be returned to the trust without tax consequences. As it is strictly
a return of capital it would be considered to be capital and the income beneficiary
would have no entitlement to it.
As you can see from a trust law point of view, the general rule is that capital
appreciation or return of capital to a trust forms part of the corpus of the
trust to which the income beneficiary has no entitlement. Whether that is considered
to be income for income tax purposes depends upon the very technical way in
which the distribution is made and does not in and of itself change the nature
of the distribution for trust law purposes. This entire area is a very difficult
one and one in which trustees must be very careful when allocating between income
and capital. A number of large trust companies take the position that if there
is any doubt, the distribution is considered to be capital unless a judge rules
otherwise.
Lancaster, Brooks & Welch L.L.P.
St. Catharines Office
P.O. Box 790, 80 King Street., St. Catharines, Ontario, L2R 6Z1
Tel: 905.641.1551 Fax: 905.641.1830
Welland Office
P.O. Box 67, 247 East Main Street, Welland, Ontario L3B 5N9
Tel: 905.735.5684 Fax: 905.735.3340
Grimsby Office
55 Main Street West, Grimsby, Ontario, L3M 1R3
Tel: 905.594.1263 Fax: 905.594.1268
This page and all our Web Site contents are © 2010, Lancaster, Brooks & Welch L.L.P.
